3 ms·
I think this is relevant to ideas about AI explosions. There's a standard argument that's something like "once the machine reach 150 IQ, we've reached AGI and
by joe_the_user 2y ago
I think this is relevant to ideas about AI explosions.
There's a standard argument that's something like "once the machine reach 150 IQ, we've reached AGI and humans are done". Not that the AI isn't making leaps but this much too simplistic. Human capacities are much more than what's measured on an IQ test. Just as starter for considering , look at Moravec's paradox.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moravec%27s_paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moravec%27s_paradox
- scotty79 2y ago> Human capacities are much more than what's measured on an IQ test. Sure but IQ test result correlates with many of them. Even something as strange as athletic performance: https://www.scitepress.org/Papers/2017/70672/70672.pdf https://www.scitepress.org/Papers/2017/70672/70672.pdf