3 ms·
The difference is most of those things aren't built with tangible, perpetual representations in mind. For literally all of the time that the written word has e
by NilMostChill 2y ago
The difference is most of those things aren't built with tangible, perpetual representations in mind.
For literally all of the time that the written word has existed, if you bought a physical copy it was yours for whatever version of perpetuity you'd like to use.
Of course libraries exist, as do rentals, but it's clearly understood what the deal is with such services.
The specific issue i see here is that this is changing retroactively and without recourse, the ability to download a copy of the item you purchased, which was the deal at the time of purchase.
If you buy anything from now on, however, knowing the details of the sale, that's on you.
- tw04 2y agoIt is also hopefully going to result in people going back to libraries. If Amazon is telling you that you can never own an ebook, why pay for it at all? Just borrow it from the local library for free.
- kelnos 2y agoI feel like the average person isn't going to think through the implications, or won't care, and will continue buying Kindle books. I wish more people were on the same page (heh) as us here when it comes to licensing vs. ownership, but I just don't believe that's the case.