6 ms·
This list of requirements is excessive and nobody wants to read through endless documents and do endless risk assessments. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safet
by jonatron 2y ago
This list of requirements is excessive and nobody wants to read through endless documents and do endless risk assessments.
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/important-dates-for-online-safety-compliance/#dutiesandactions https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-c...
Children's access assessments - 32 pages
Guidance on highly effective age assurance and other Part 5 duties - 50 pages
Protecting people from illegal harms online - 84 pages
Illegal content Codes of Practice for user-to-user services - 84 pages
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- dv_dt 2y agoWhat happens with cross nation access? Will international sites start to refuse accounts to brits?
- yuriks 2y agoI believe lobste.rs is one site that's going to geoblock the UK as a precautionary measure at least
- pbhjpbhj 2y agoI thought that was a tech site, are they hosting porn now? I'd have thought they'd already police hate crimes, encouraging suicide, self-harm, and such?? Perhaps they have a special section where they encourage kids to huff glue?
- Aurornis 2y agoYou’re missing the point. The law is so vague and broad that it could be interpreted as covering even far more innocuous content than the few extreme examples you listed here.
- thereisnospork 2y agoThe 'if they have nothing to hide' argument? Really? I look forward to reading your fully compliant risk assessment before interacting with this comment, lest it be judged to contain offensive, inappropriate, or pornographic content.