4 ms·
I thought this was going to discuss about Apache RewriteRules
by lutherqueen 2y ago
I thought this was going to discuss about Apache RewriteRules
- chrisweekly 2y agoMe too. I went DEEP into mod_rewrite, mod_proxy and friends in the early 2000's. It's a dangerous place to put too much logic, but also incredibly powerful. On multiple occasions, I used it to solve problems in a couple hours that would've taken the engineering team weeks or months to address.
- pavel_lishin 2y agoCan you say more about this? It sounds really interesting!
- philzook 2y agoI'm curious if there is a useful connection between Apache's rule and other term rewriting. Some sort of static analysis? If there is a interesting database of them, I'd add it.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- DamonHD 2y agoYep, and I had a whole bunch ready to show off! I've even given talks about them at conferences! B^>
- janderson215 2y agoDo you have slides posted anywhere or a video of one of your talks that you could share?
- DamonHD 2y agoFOSDEM unplanned(!) lightning talk (video and PDF): https://fosdem.org/2025/schedule/event/fosdem-2025-6839-lightning-talk-podcast-feeds/ https://fosdem.org/2025/schedule/event/fosdem-2025-6839-ligh... Also see main working page: https://www.earth.org.uk/RSS-efficiency.html https://www.earth.org.uk/RSS-efficiency.html I can point you to bits of config (it's a bit scattered in my blogs at the moment) like this: https://www.earth.org.uk/note-on-site-technicals-83.html#2024-04-14 https://www.earth.org.uk/note-on-site-technicals-83.html#202...
- janderson215 2y agoThank you!