4 ms·
> You assume that "training" and human learning are similar things. No I don't. Because a human is choosing to enact the training regardless. Just like if a
by stale2002 2y ago
> You assume that "training" and human learning are similar things.
No I don't. Because a human is choosing to enact the training regardless.
Just like if a human held a book up to a rock. It would be ridiculous that an author could ban a human from "training" a rock from a book. Its their book, and they can show it to a rock if they want!
- amelius 2y agoIf you buy a DVD and show it at work, then that's also ok, because it is your DVD and you can do with it whatever you want? Turns out, nope, that's not ok.
- stale2002 2y ago> show it at work No that distribution. So my point stands. If you sell someone a book, you can't just put arbitrary restrictions on it. You cannot ban someone from training a model on it, nor ban you ban someone freak reading it upside down, or showing it to a rock. You tried to claim that basically any restriction can be put on how something is used. Thats simply not true. Distribution is a specific carve out that has regulations on it. But someone absolutely could train a model, as well as read it upside, or show it to a rock.