>On the plus side, some software engineers save a couple minutes here and there with a slightly nicer autocomplete, white collar workers can get some advice on

>On the plus side, some software engineers save a couple minutes here and there with a slightly nicer autocomplete, white collar workers can get some advice on email style, and maybe it helps with sifting through millions of pages of legal discovery. Lol get a grip. Jeff Dean just said 25% of the code being checked into Google's internal codebase is now AI generated. If you think it's just kids using it for homework and engineers saving a few minutes here and there you're kidding yourself. https://www.dwarkeshpatel.com/p/jeff-dean-and-noam-shazeer https://www.dwarkeshpatel.com/p/jeff-dean-and-noam-shazeer >I am hopeful for some of the more advanced applications, e.g. proof assistance in math, "I expect, say, 2026-level AI, when used properly, will be a trustworthy co-author in mathematical research, and in many other fields as well." You just aren't in the same universe as what the top experts are saying about this tech. https://unlocked.microsoft.com/ai-anthology/terence-tao/ https://unlocked.microsoft.com/ai-anthology/terence-tao/ You seem like one of those people that used GPT3.5 once and hasn't updated at all since then. You're criticizing the wright flyer and we're already at turboprops.