I don't think generations of my ancestors made any predictions about AI /s. I mean, an argument that "technology" hasn't eliminated work previously so we can a

I don't think generations of my ancestors made any predictions about AI /s. I mean, an argument that "technology" hasn't eliminated work previously so we can assume it won't do so now is ridiculously broad. I don't even think current LLMs will eliminate all jobs - I think it's limited to a particular kind of mediocre output, an output the demand for which is very elastic. But an arguments about what "AI" can do should based on it's potential, not on some "technology has always created jobs" incantation.