4 ms·
I don’t see how voting works as an analogy. Suburbs would be more apt. I live in one, but I’ll be the first to admit that there’s no defensible reason to do so
by sgarland 2y ago
I don’t see how voting works as an analogy. Suburbs would be more apt. I live in one, but I’ll be the first to admit that there’s no defensible reason to do so beyond “I want to.” They’re typically a net negative for counties in terms of tax revenue, they perpetuate car-first infrastructure, they contribute to high housing costs, and they don’t produce anything of value, like rural areas can (farms, land preservation).
- marcosdumay 2y agoWell, people have to live somewhere, and that place will not generate a lot of revenue. US suburbs have problems due to single-use areas and forced low density. But you will aleays have some area that don't pay a lot of taxes.