2 ms·
> Most of the atrocities were done by people who hated the "theoretically smart, high-achieving young people" No, most of the atrocities were done to eliminate
by motorest 2y ago
> Most of the atrocities were done by people who hated the "theoretically smart, high-achieving young people"
No, most of the atrocities were done to eliminate political threats by targeting everyone who had a semblance of power and did not fell in line. Academia was targeted not because of an anti-intellectual push but because they could counter the influence of the new totalitarian regime trying to establish itself. There's a good reason why the leaders of said authoritarian pushes were lauded as the brightest minds in the land, whose writings should be consumed with a religious fervor.
- derangedHorse 2y ago> No, most of the atrocities were done to eliminate political threats by targeting everyone who had a semblance of power And what power did most of these professors have if not their minds? This does not go against my assertion, it sounds like a "no" just to say "no" Read what it was actually like: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0001275005.pdf https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0001275005.pdf
- motorest 2y ago> And what power did most of these professors have if not their minds? You're completely missing the point. Their academic careers put them in a position where their role was literally to shape and influence the next generation. As they were not fervent supporters, their role posed a threat to the regime. They could be profoundly dumb or grossly incompetent professors for what its worth. It's just that they didn't lockstep with the regime and the regime didn't wanted to risk it.