4 ms·
is this sarcasm? it's been known for years and we got some more "official" info recently this is the grant, but this was public info for years https://oversigh
by stainablesteel 2y ago
is this sarcasm? it's been known for years and we got some more "official" info recently
this is the grant, but this was public info for years
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Year-5-EHAv.pdf https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Year-...
- bad_haircut72 2y agoNo its not sarcasm, thanks for the reference. However since you were rude Im gonna ignore this evidence (this attitude can work for or against Republicans I guess)
- dekhn 2y agoI'll be less rude: the US funded virus research in China. Some people argue this was wise because it gave us insight into China's bioweapons plans, or be prepared for world disasters, or whatever. It's still not entirely clear why NIH leadership thought this was a good idea, given our understanding of China's relative immaturity in working with dangerous viruses, as well as preventing that funding from going to US researchers.
- bad_haircut72 2y agoI had sorta thought this was a right wing conspiracy, as it seemed so unlikely to be true. I can very clearly understand why the new administration is being ruthless with them now, especially given Trumps experience with Covid (a more enlightened leader might say the buck stopped with him instead of blaming underlings, but I digress). Thanks for replying.
- dekhn 2y agoI'm not sure how to interpret what you're saying. NIAID has worked with China for decades, https://www.niaid.nih.gov/research/niaid-research-china https://www.niaid.nih.gov/research/niaid-research-china which spans multiple partisan administrations. I think (but can't find at the moment) that there was a law mandating NIAID work with China to keep up-to-date on evolving biodefense. The complaint is really about the establishment, not decisions from a specific president or party.