4 ms·
1) Were employees ordered to implement PRs to go through all code and auto-remove all mentions of "master" and "whitelist" from public facing code (not just int
by insane_dreamer 2y ago
1) Were employees ordered to implement PRs to go through all code and auto-remove all mentions of "master" and "whitelist" from public facing code (not just internal identifiers).
2) False equivalency.
- TeeMassive 2y ago[flagged]
- IshKebab 2y ago> Were employees ordered to implement PRs to go through all code and auto-remove all mentions of "master" and "whitelist" from public facing code (not just internal identifiers) Uhm, yes. Yes they were. Here's one example: https://workspaceupdates.googleblog.com/2021/09/renaming-whitelisted-domains-to-allowlisted-domains-in-admin-console.html https://workspaceupdates.googleblog.com/2021/09/renaming-whi...
- insane_dreamer 2y agoWe're talking about gov employees here
- IshKebab 2y agoAh so the morality of censorship depends on exactly who your employer is. Got it.
- insane_dreamer 2y agoNope; the OP's argument was that the previous administration did the same thing. Stay on track with the discussion.
- IshKebab 2y agoI am on track. You've misread. They never said that the previous administration was responsible for the whole `master` thing. > This seems just as ridiculous and frustrating as a few years ago, dropping whatever they're doing to remove "master" and "whitelisting" from the code. Different team, same silliness.