3 ms·
Seems like it's just a PR for removing it from the government website? Also, looks like they're adding a deletedAt field and soft deleting items in the databas
by hk1337 2y ago
Seems like it's just a PR for removing it from the government website?
Also, looks like they're adding a deletedAt field and soft deleting items in the database rather than hard delete.
- Hizonner 2y ago> Seems like it's just a PR for removing it from the government website? As a new crash priority ordered from outside by people who have probably never heard of the project. Not disruptive or anything. That's definitely how you manage a large organization. Oh, and this particular "PR" does nothing to aid anybody or improve anything. There's that, too. > Also, looks like they're adding a deletedAt field and soft deleting items in the database rather than hard delete. Protecting themselves in case it gets rolled back, I imagine. When you get toddlers in charge, you can expect new "crash priority" rule changes on a daily basis, so you learn to prepare.
- crooked-v 2y agoThe word "just" there is doing a lot to gloss over the absurdity of government workers ordered to censor the word 'equity' instead of doing actual work.