3 ms·
PFOF isn't (typically) illegal, a better word might be "controversial". There's nothing free in this life: the zero commission brokers are making it up somehow.
by benreesman 2y ago
PFOF isn't (typically) illegal, a better word might be "controversial". There's nothing free in this life: the zero commission brokers are making it up somehow.
While the studies on how PFOF effects execution quality are varied, this summary [1] from Wharton seems fairly balanced. It's not as simple as citing NBBO and moving on.
Personally I'm suspicious of the practice mostly because of the pretty clear conflicts of interest that it creates. Again, this is controversial, but the people arguing it's ok are for the most part making money from it.
[1] https://wifpr.wharton.upenn.edu/uncategorized/research-spotlight-payment-for-order-flow-and-price-improvement/ https://wifpr.wharton.upenn.edu/uncategorized/research-spotl...
- xadhominemx 2y agoRobinhood makes the majority of their revenue on options and crypto. Vanilla equities is becoming less important.
- loeg 2y agoThe zero commission brokers typically make most of their revenue on net interest margin. PFOF is a smaller portion.
- Scoundreller 2y agosecurities lending doesn’t hurt if your clientele likes heavy short-interest-worthy meme stocks
- loeg 2y agoYeah I'm mostly talking about traditional discount brokerages (Fidelity, Schwab), not Robinhood.