3 ms·
It is entirely relevant to the parent comment. As to the second part, it requires a bit of reading comprehension and contextual awareness, unfortunately.
by adam_arthur 2y ago
It is entirely relevant to the parent comment.
As to the second part, it requires a bit of reading comprehension and contextual awareness, unfortunately.
- Dylan16807 2y agoIt's not relevant. You're looking for something to complain about and latching on where it doesn't fit. Even full approval of Apple's motion would not be rooting for anticompetitive behavior. It makes sense for Apple to be involved in this rulemaking. And it does seem like too much if the rule blocks any dealing between the two companies in any market. But the above comment was far weaker than that. It was just saying a restriction that strong would prevent things that are not already illegal. That is a basic fact.