3 ms·
$3.4K is about what you might pay a magic circle lawyer for an opinion on a matter. Not saying o3 is an efficient use of resources, just saying that it’s not ou
by jl6 2y ago
$3.4K is about what you might pay a magic circle lawyer for an opinion on a matter. Not saying o3 is an efficient use of resources, just saying that it’s not outlandish that a sufficiently good AI could be worth that kind of money.
- ant6n 2y agoWhat’s the liability insurance of the AI like
- baq 2y agoRefer to IBM’s 1979 slide for details on that
- victorbjorklund 2y agoYou pay that price to a law firm to get good service and to get a "guarantee" of correctness. You get neither from an LLM. Not saying it is not worth anything but you cant compare it to a top law firm.
- nl 2y agoYou absolutely do not get a "guarantee" of correctness (event with the airquotes) from any lawyer.
- manquer 2y agoYou can sue a lawyer giving certain kinds of bad advice and occasionally win . That is what the guarantee is about
- bobxmax 2y agoYou can probably sue Open AI for getting bad legal advice from ChatGPT too.
- throw-qqqqq 2y agoSure, but can you also win the case ;)? On the bottom of ChatGPT.com I see a disclaimer: “ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info”. I don’t think you can succesfully sue with such caveat emptor.