3 ms·
> does it match the “cross-platform” description Yes, it's a plain-text editor too. The files are compatible with the Commodore 64 if you need. > not yet supp
by JTyQZSnP3cQGa8B 2y ago
> does it match the “cross-platform” description
Yes, it's a plain-text editor too. The files are compatible with the Commodore 64 if you need.
> not yet supported in Firefox ... implies offline support ...
It implies a lot more stuff than all the other pre-installed plain-text editors on every other OS.
- dspillett 2y ago> It implies a lot more stuff than all the other pre-installed plain-text editors on every other OS. I read it as promising Notepad features with anything else it mentions as extras, not more features it doesn't mention from other text editors.
- vunderba 2y agoCross platform refers to the application itself, not the files that it produces. TextEdit is a poor substitute, a much better alternative would be Sublime.
- oneeyedpigeon 2y agoI like Coteditor [1] as an open-source, minimal editor. TextEdit isn't even plain text by default, IIRC. [1] https://coteditor.com/ https://coteditor.com/
- pasc1878 2y agoNotepad was not cross platform
- dspillett 2y agoYou've lost the context from a few posts up (and the original post) – the project being discussed states its intent to recreate the notepad experience in a cross-platform manner, hence “cross-platform” is relevant.