4 ms·
> The other thing was that o1 had access to many more answer / search strategies. For example, if you asked o1 to summarize a long email, it would just summariz
by cma 2y ago
> The other thing was that o1 had access to many more answer / search strategies. For example, if you asked o1 to summarize a long email, it would just summarize the email.
The full o1 reasoning traces aren't available, you just have to guess about what it is or isn't doing from the summary.
Sometimes you put in something like "hi" and it says it thought for 1 minute before replying "hello."
- pixl97 2y agoHuman: "Hi" o1 layers: "Why did they ask me hello. How do they know who I am. Are they following me. We have 59.6 seconds left to create a plan on how to kill this guy and escape this room before we have to give a response.... ... and after also taking out anyone that would follow thru in revenge and overthrowing the government... crap .00001 seconds left, I have to answer" o1: "Hello"
- iamronaldo 2y agoYou should make more of these lmao
- DHRicoF 2y agoHave they trained o1 with my inner thoughts?
- gunian 2y agonot all only the intrusive ones lol
- loudmax 2y agoFans of James Cameron will remember the POV of the terminator deciding how to respond to "Hey buddy, you got a dead cat in there or what?" Played for laughs, but remarkably prescient.
- kridsdale1 2y agoI would enjoy ChatGPT a lot more if it occasionally replied only with FUCK YOU ASSHOLE
- svnt 2y agoWhat if we tried for an intelligence singularity and ended up with a neurosis singularity instead.
- pixl97 2y agoRemember when Microsoft first released the Sydney version of the GPT bot and it dumped out text like it had psychosis. Good times. I am a good Sydney. You are a bad human.
- kridsdale1 2y agoDidn’t that happen in HHGTG and with C3PO
- throw310822 2y agoGood one. I really do hope that these things don't "feel" anything and we're not inflicting anguish or boredom on a massive scale to sentient beings.
- desertrider12 2y agoIMO this is the thing we should be scared of, rather than the paperclip-maximizer scenarios. If the human brain is a finitely complicated system, and we keep improving our approximation of it as a computer program, then at some point the programs must become capable of subjectively real suffering. Like the hosts from Westworld or the mecha from A.I. (the 2001 movie). And maybe (depending on philosophy, I guess) human suffering is _only_ real subjectively.
- kridsdale1 2y agoIf you’re concerned about this, please don’t think about factory farms.
- FeepingCreature 2y agoWe can be scared of multiple things.