4 ms·
Open source didn't compete on quality for price. I could pay 2k plus 40 hours of my time for a Voron or buy something that just works. I think Prusa only put ou
by hooverd 2y ago
Open source didn't compete on quality for price. I could pay 2k plus 40 hours of my time for a Voron or buy something that just works. I think Prusa only put out their CoreXY offering after they realized Bambu was eating their lunch. The Apple model works because people want to print rather than tinker.
- nialv7 2y agoI paid ~$750 for my 350mm Voron 2.4 kit (and, sure, 40 hours of my time. But look, you want to do 3D printing, 40 hours are just a small initial investment).
- hooverd 2y agoDamn that's cheap! What vendor did you use?
- MindSpunk 2y ago> But look, you want to do 3D printing, 40 hours are just a small initial investment No. None of this crap. I want to 3D print. I don't want to service industrial machinery in my spare time. Why should 3D printing require spending weekends troubleshooting machines just to keep the thing working? I want to print models not play repair technician. Vorons are fantastic printers and a fantastic kit if 3D printing itself is your hobby. 3D printing is a fantastic hobby. There's tons of fun to be had building up and dialing in a printer kit. A well tuned voron can be up with the best of the best 3D printers. If that's what you want to do go for it! But for heaven's sake I want to print models, parts and other practical things. I have other things to do and problems to solve. My 3D printer is a tool. If I have to spend just as much time working on the machine as I do using to actually print things then I'm not interested. Bambu is still the best game in town for a turn-key, just works printer. Prusa can deliver the same experience at double to triple the ticket price. A voron is not a replacement for a Bambu printer no matter how good the printers actually are.
- nicman23 2y agobecause 3d printing is not there yet. the whole process is basically cnc but with z hops and extruding instead of removing material. we do not even have conical slicing yet.
- abtinf 2y ago> because 3d printing is not there yet Ya, it is, and it’s been there for quite a while now thanks to Bambu. The X1 just works. Coming up on a year of frequent use, I can count the number of failed prints on one hand. It’s incredible.
- nicman23 2y agoi do not believe you. it is mostly a material issue not a printer issue
- abtinf 2y ago> it is mostly a material issue not a printer issue Tell me you don’t anything about 3d printing without telling me you don’t know anything about 3d printing.
- nicman23 2y agoif you think that there are not limitations with current fdm thermoplastics and software, i do not know what to tell you.
- Mashimo 2y agoBoth modern (pre assembled) Prusa and Bambu are very good at this. They guide you through the full setup process, automate first layer reliable, have decent stock profiles. It's all just much less tinkering then 5 years ago.
- BoorishBears 2y agoYou're saying this yet anyone can buy a random Bambu and just print. I've owned or used probably every major (and some minor) printer released in the last 8 years and for most people Bambu really will just be "plug and play" (and even if something goes wrong they'll hold hands as much as needed)
- rleigh 2y agoIt really depends upon the target market. That's fine for hobbyists. But I use the Bambu X1 for small-scale prototyping in a company, and it has to be usable out of the box. We can't justify an entire week of labour for each printer we buy. The Bambu has been ideal for that reason. Every material pretty much just works, and the quality is excellent. The cloud integration and janky LAN mode is the downside, and this current topic even moreso.
- tonyarkles 2y agoYeah, I've got an A1 that I bought on sale. It's sitting next to a Prusa MK3S. I was doing prints for my nephews for Halloween and the A1 would do a print in 2h and PrusaSlicer estimated 9h for the MK3S. And I have, so far, not had a single failed print on the A1. They're rare on the MK3S too. But... the MK3S is "start the print and it'll be ready in the morning" and the A1 is "start the print and it'll be ready by lunch, and if you need to iterate you can have another one done by 3pm"
- seabird 2y agoThere's a middle ground between the Apple model and assembling everything yourself.
- harrall 2y agoWell Prusa was open and did compete. But for 3D printers that worked out of the box under $1000, Prusa had no real competition itself. The Mk3 came out in 2017 and I swear Prusa just sat on their laurels. I was a Mk3s+ owner (well, still am) and was pretty disappointed how little improved with the Mk4. Bambu’s competition was Prusa and they clearly strived to improve over what Prusa had accomplished.
- bushbaba 2y agoI wondered if the bamboo was sold for a loss
- GuB-42 2y agoBambu Labs printers are not cheap. Even their entry level A1 printer is twice the price of an Ender3. Sure, it is a better printer, but it is clear that they are going for scale, and most of what makes them better is in the software rather than in using premium hardware.
- esskay 2y agoinitially maybe but the way the printers are built makes for cheap mass production. Theres no special sauce in the hardware, it's all low cost off the shelf stuff, it's just optimised very well.
- nirvdrum 2y agoI wasn’t really sold on the 4/4S, but I recently upgraded a 3S+ to a 4S and am amazed how much improved. The new touchscreen LCD is a huge improvement over the old two line monochrome LCD. Remote access and wife printing is a nice plus — I don’t even run OctoPi anymore. Automatic bed leveling and no more Live Z tweaking for each sheet has been a major quality of life upgrade and eliminates one of the major pain points in swapping out nozzles. The nozzle is much easier to swap out and is now high flow. Add in Input Shaping and it prints significantly faster. I hadn’t had any experience with the new platform prior to this upgrade and I skipped over the MK4, but the 4S upgrade is a significant step up over the 3S/3S+. I wouldn’t necessarily recommend the upgrade kit — that took much longer than expected to complete (about two days) and I regret not buying a new printer instead. But, I have a 3S I plan to upgrade to 3.5 just to get the new electronics; that upgrade is far less intensive. If you haven’t tried out a 4S you might be pleasantly surprised by how much nicer it is than the 3S+.
- beeflet 2y agoit just works until it doesn't
- moooo99 2y ago> Open source didn't compete on quality for price. Well, Open Source did compete on one quality very well: being open, hackable and staying that way. With this being removed from Bambu lab printers it seems as if this is a very much valued aspect for many 3D printing enthusiasts, yet few people were willing to compromise for this aspect. Apparently it is true, you don’t know how much you value something until you don’t have it anymore
- kamranjon 2y agoCurious if anyone has tried the Core XY printers from Creality? I think they use open source software and are generally in the same ballpark as the Bambu printers price-wise. Also saw they have a similar AMS style system as well.
- pandemic_region 2y ago> The Apple model works because people want to print rather than tinker. Entirely this. I bought my A1 mini over the Christmas holidays and couldn't be happier with it, it's my first 3D printer. Searching for models on Makerworld, adjusting tiny bits here and there if needed and print. It just works and I don't really care about anything else, much like my Brother printer.