3 ms·
It's about how trains are running. Consider a rail network connected like A-B-C . With terminating trains you'd have one train run A-B-A, and another train run
by crote 2y ago
It's about how trains are running.
Consider a rail network connected like A-B-C . With terminating trains you'd have one train run A-B-A, and another train run C-B-C. With through trains you'd have one train run A-B-C and another train run C-B-A. Terminating trains have to stop and reverse, which takes quite a lot of time because the driver has to go to the other end of the train. Through trains can just continue in the same direction, so it is a lot faster.
Because a through train occupies the track for less time you don't need as many tracks to serve the same number of trains per hour.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- bobthepanda 2y agomore importantly, if A and C are suburban locations, they probably don't need as much expansion as dogpiling everything in B, which is even more expensive because B is a block of some of the most expensive global real estate in the world.