3 ms·
As written there are several problems with your theory: A) The bill is about transfer of user information, not investment in a company. B) Saudi Arabia owns a
by happyopossum 2y ago
As written there are several problems with your theory:
A) The bill is about transfer of user information, not investment in a company.
B) Saudi Arabia owns a small, non controlling interest in Twitter/x
C) Saudi Arabia is not on the list of foreign adversary countries
So you’d have a hard time making that ‘strong’ argument.
- sitkack 2y agoUnstated, I implied that Saudi Arabia should be on the list. That maybe the list should be behavioral instead of statutory. SA has lead directly and indirectly to the loss of more American lives than any of those countries. 9/11 was perpetrated by mostly Saudis. Sum the knock on deaths as you will. The killing of Jamal Khashoggi https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45812399 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45812399 We are trying to get away from Saudi influence and control so much that we look the other way while we pump poison into our water. So much so that the Simpson's even have an episode devoted to it where Marge exclaims, "the water is on fire!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQ29JFoVqCE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQ29JFoVqCE Maybe the list should be behavior based?