3 ms·
You seem to equate the some straw man version of the cloud to simple rack hosting in a single location. They are nothing alike. A cloud service is almost always
by ikiris 2y ago
You seem to equate the some straw man version of the cloud to simple rack hosting in a single location. They are nothing alike. A cloud service is almost always geographically diverse and highly available in a way that is beyond most people to build out.
- Over2Chars 2y agoAm I? Cloud providers usually quote price estimates for their least redundant single region services to give the impression of cost competitiveness. But their virtual offerings are much less reliable than a standalone system by a lot (they guarantee to refund you the 25cents for your instance if it goes down, not the value of the service interruption or its cost. lol! Read that TOS) What's the solution to their inherent unreliability? Redundancy at more cost. Well, hey, you can rent two colocation facilities if you really need redundancy across geographic regions. And maybe you can just use your colo as a source for a CDN that is geographically diverse (for latency, not hurricanes). Geographic diversity and HA is beyond most people? If you're the kind of business that needs that, you can hire the exact same people that Amazon Pip'd and fired because they didn't hit some arbitrary ticket metrics, to scale your business. e.g. https://www.forbes.com/sites/lucianapaulise/2022/10/27/amazons-high-attrition-could-cost-8-billion-annually/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/lucianapaulise/2022/10/27/amazo...