4 ms·

I think you're reaching for outrage. I don't see anywhere in this comment's ancestry where anyone said anything resembling that.

• tw04 2y ago
  That’s literally what the new Facebook policy is that she’s referring to in the article… it was previously banned, zuck has decided that it’s now perfectly acceptable, if not encouraged behavior.
  • peeters 2y ago
    I understand your objection to the policy, I just don't understand where in this thread you latched onto anything objectionable. At most the OP said the slurs don't make sense (really they didn't even say that, they just clarified the subject of what they were saying made sense). Are you saying the slurs DO make sense? Or is it possible you added some words to what the OP actually said and then objected to that?
    • tw04 2y ago
      [flagged]
      • dkresge 2y ago
        I believe the intent was thus: “Aye, that makes sense (not the [reauthorization of] slurs, but the explanation). Thanks.”