4 ms·
Wow, that's actually very nice in terms of RAM usage. Right now in chrome, with only 6 tabs open I am using (according to about:memory)800MB of RAM[1]. I may ve
by lelandbatey 14y ago
Wow, that's actually very nice in terms of RAM usage. Right now in chrome, with only 6 tabs open I am using (according to about:memory)800MB of RAM[1]. I may very well switch back to Firefox if I can get performance like that.
[1]http://puu.sh/JXL9 http://puu.sh/JXL9
- mixmastamyk 14y agoIs any of that shared memory? A bit offtopic, but do you typically keep your browser at that width? I imagine I'd be spending much of my day swinging my eyes and head from side to side.
- lelandbatey 14y agoI really don't know. Also, yes, I do often keep read at this width. Web pages usually do not span the entirety of it, so the eye movement is kept to a minimum. However, I spend most of my day in a view closer to [1]this one. You'll notice that the monitor is just large enough that 2 standard width web pages fit on it perfectly. [1]http://puu.sh/JZDy http://puu.sh/JZDy
- cpeterso 14y agoIs it normal for a gmail tab to use 250+ MB?
- lelandbatey 14y agoI don't think it's supposed to, and that's what's making me thing it might be time to switch to Firefox.
- ingenium 14y agoOnly 250MB? For me it's 600-850MB... it's ridiculous.
- joshschreuder 14y agoWeird. My version of about:memory shows ~600MB used, but the Task Manager in Chrome (Shift-ESC) shows only ~160MB. Not sure what the discrepancy is there.