2 ms·
Given that there doesn’t appear to be any harms from this treatment, why is it moral (or legal) to prevent humans from experimentally seeking it, standard “in m
by sneak 2y ago
Given that there doesn’t appear to be any harms from this treatment, why is it moral (or legal) to prevent humans from experimentally seeking it, standard “in mice” argument notwithstanding?
- wetpaws 2y ago[dead]
- deepnet 2y agoUltrasound selfies at home, clinical trial reports self administered ultrasound scans on par with professional ones. https://www.nibib.nih.gov/news-events/newsroom/ultrasound-selfies-little-training-patients-could-produce-high-quality-medical-images-home https://www.nibib.nih.gov/news-events/newsroom/ultrasound-se...
- andy_ppp 2y agoI don’t disagree but an issue could be that there’s plenty of people out there who would happily make up therapies that sound like they could work and take people’s money for unsound treatments.
- gklitz 2y agoThe framework for clinical trials it to go from “there doesn’t appear to be any harm” to “we have reasonable proof that no harm is expected”. If this is as promising as it sounds it’ll surely process through the stages as it should and eventually reach human trials.
- celdon25 2y agoEventually plus 10 years, as this article is 10 years old.
- nine_k 2y agoBusiness opportunity: add a 2 MHz ultrasound enmitter to standard headphones.
- aeve890 2y agoI'll deep-fry and eat a brick and wash it down with motor oil if Apple ended up curing Alzheimer's