4 ms·
I don't recall Windows 95 spatially minimizing windows into the bottom of the screen while preserving their dynamically updating contents. Did it? Or was it ful
by incanus77 2y ago
I don't recall Windows 95 spatially minimizing windows into the bottom of the screen while preserving their dynamically updating contents. Did it? Or was it full of identical grey rectangles and moved window contents just by their outline, not their contents? The Aqua interface was a cut above given the landscape even five years later.
- eru 2y ago> Or was it full of identical grey rectangles and moved window contents just by their outline, not their contents? It moved the whole window, but you could enable the effect you mention to save on system resources. (If memory serves right.)
- dcrazy 2y agoI believe full-window moves were an optional Windows 98 feature. Possibly also available in Windows 95 via registry tweaks or if you had Microsoft Plus! installed.
- ben7799 2y agoIt's kind of easy to forget OSX did this but it was glacially slow at first. I remember seeing the Betas in 1999-2000 or so and they were on an iMac and the whole UI barely worked. And I think in 2004-2006 I was still turning the animations down or selecting the simpler ones. I maybe started leaving them on when I got a monster Mac Pro in 2006.