3 ms·
Eyewitness testimony has been proven to be unreliable; even in cases where there is no evidence the witness attempted to be deceptive. So yes, if literally the
by gizmo686 2y ago
Eyewitness testimony has been proven to be unreliable; even in cases where there is no evidence the witness attempted to be deceptive. So yes, if literally the only evidence that they were the person to assume you is your memory, then the standard of reasonable doubt means they get away with it.
- add-sub-mul-div 2y ago[flagged]
- bigstrat2003 2y agoThere's nothing wild about following the principles of the Western justice system to their logical conclusion. The accused is presumed innocent until proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. "The victim could be mistaken/lying" is a pretty reasonable doubt.