Again why bother reading anything from the WSJ. Before Murdock took it over it had relevant articles. Now it is just a propaganda rag. I am sure it does not

Again why bother reading anything from the WSJ. Before Murdock took it over it had relevant articles. Now it is just a propaganda rag. I am sure it does not mention the US States that still enforces Net Neutrality and that court case did not restrict the States Enforcement. A couple of very large State through its enforcement will probably keep it active in the US until another admin comes in and brings it back. This is the main problem with the US these days, every 4 to 8 years all consumer laws change nationwide except for ~40% of the population. What does that mean ? Nationwide companies probably stay with the more restrictive laws anyway because it is cheaper.