> This one is interesting. I would have no idea what a "submitter's" purpose is here with or without Typescript. > I am excited to see how this code base chang

> This one is interesting. I would have no idea what a "submitter's" purpose is here with or without Typescript. > I am excited to see how this code base changes without Typescript. The "types" or what things are will have to be communicated in some way. This may lead to very readable code. This is funny to me. "If we don't have the compiler checking types the developers will perfectly compensate with documentation, an improvement." Maybe remove the unit tests as well, then the developers will write accurate code.