> That clearly includes use for training, because you can't train without making a copy, even if the copy is subsequently thrown away. a copy for ingestion pur

> That clearly includes use for training, because you can't train without making a copy, even if the copy is subsequently thrown away. a copy for ingestion purposes - such as viewing in a browser, is not the same as a distribution copy that you make sending it to another person. > the right to extract the semantic or cultural value of a document. this right does not belong to the author - in fact, this is not an explicit right granted by the copyright act. Therefore, the extraction of information from a works is not something the author can (nor should) control. Otherwise, how would anyone learn off a textbook, music or art? In the future, when the courts finally decide what the limits of ML training is, may be it will be a new right granted to authors. But it isn't one atm.