4 ms·
No need to give up anything, except a poorly designed regulatory environment : https://www.construction-physics.com/p/why-are-nuclear-power-construction-370 ht
by zizee 2y ago
No need to give up anything, except a poorly designed regulatory environment :
https://www.construction-physics.com/p/why-are-nuclear-power-construction-370 https://www.construction-physics.com/p/why-are-nuclear-power...
- HDThoreaun 2y agoNow for the real reason, voters dont want to.
- zizee 2y agoThey don't want to what? Don't want to give up poorly designed regulations? Or do not want nuclear power? The latter is largely due to the anti nuclear movement, as sponsored by the petroleum industry. This will go down in history as one of the biggest self-owns in trying to protect the environment. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kensilverstein/2016/07/13/are-fossil-fuel-interests-bankrolling-the-anti-nuclear-energy-movement/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/kensilverstein/2016/07/13/are-f...
- dalyons 2y agoDon’t want to be forced to pay a premium for the most expensive mainstream form of power generation.
- zizee 2y agoAnd we're back to the beginning. One of the major costs of current reactors is regulatory burden. One of the reasons we don't see improvements in costs is it is extremely hard to release changes or new designs.
- HDThoreaun 2y agoDont want to be scared of a nuclear meltdown
- zizee 2y agoWe should put a stop to hydro electric as well https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Banqiao_Dam_failure https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Banqiao_Dam_failure
- HDThoreaun 2y agoDont let the voters know about this or we will