3 ms·
> 0: It's not that we're old but that we will be old by the time we're done. Raising children when you're old is so much harder, and you'll be mega-old when th
by thatfrenchguy 2y ago
> 0: It's not that we're old but that we will be old by the time we're done.
Raising children when you're old is so much harder, and you'll be mega-old when they're 20. I really don't see the point?
- renewiltord 2y agoThe point is to avoid that precise problem by parallelizing the child-having. My wife can only have one child at a time and medically recommended spacing is 18 months. The objective is to have our children as young as we can given our current ages.
- echoangle 2y agoI hope it’s not too personal, ignore if it is: How many children are you aiming for?
- renewiltord 2y agoGiven that we have this limit and our age, 3 if her health permits. If we could parallelize, one could imagine twice that+.
- beachtaxidriver 2y agoIf you don't mind me asking, how many are you starting with now? Because three is a lot. And if you're starting from 0 or 1 today, I can't imagine you actually want six.
- renewiltord 2y agoWe'll see where we get. In some sense, the revealed preference is that I didn't, considering I prioritized my career over finding a partner. But we'll see.