4 ms·
If it carries the "machine gun" ability with it, it's like ... The Enchanted Seer of Automatic Firing. It turns a 'plain gun' into a machine gun, and there are
by AceyMan 2y ago
If it carries the "machine gun" ability with it, it's like ... The Enchanted Seer of Automatic Firing.
It turns a 'plain gun' into a machine gun, and there are almost no other ways to do that. So it seems like calling it "a machine gun" is reasonable from linguistic perspective. #wittgenstein
- Dylan16807 2y agoI don't think the "almost no other ways to do that" part holds up.
- lostlogin 2y agoYes, other countries manage. Restricting gun ownership rather than machine gun ownership is one approach.
- LorenPechtel 2y agoNo. The seers have been banned. I don't think anyone thinks they're not machine gun parts. What's been going on is the ATF has been going after a variety of methods of circumventing the concept--means of using the recoil to "pull" the trigger without the operator actually pulling it. The result sure acts like a machine gun, albeit an unreliable and inaccurate one. The problem is that it's simply too easy to do, they are fighting a hopeless battle. My understanding is the same problem applies to silencers--plenty of filters out there that just happen to be of the right size to function as silencers. And there isn't even any reason for the rules against silencers. They aren't like Hollywood, it's still loud but below the threshold of hearing damage.