4 ms·
Really? Let's say the bottom 70% of earners in the U.S. decided that AI was dangerous and its development should be stopped. Do you think the top 30% would allo
by vouaobrasil 2y ago
Really? Let's say the bottom 70% of earners in the U.S. decided that AI was dangerous and its development should be stopped. Do you think the top 30% would allow that?
- MichaelZuo 2y agoHow does this relate to the Security Council or any other known mechanisms that operate in the world?
- vouaobrasil 2y agoBecause those mechanisms don't work to stop most of the dangerous economic activities.
- MichaelZuo 2y agoThey would work as mechanisms after the point when the world’s nations agree to it… Like I said…? Clearly the world’s nations aren’t guaranteed to share your views…
- vouaobrasil 2y agoMy entire point is that we don't have mechanisms to protect the people. I was not referring to the power structure of the nations, or those with the most money.
- MichaelZuo 2y agoThis seems to be going in circles… Who gets to define “protect the people”…?
- vouaobrasil 2y agoPerhaps we should hold a referendum: destroy AI?
- MichaelZuo 2y agoWho has the authority to hold any referendum for the entire planet? Dodging the core issue over and over again isn’t going to lead anywhere…