3 ms·
Unfortunately, the entire reason I didn't release Unicorn under an OSI approved license is because I see many (most?) FOSS projects are chronically underfunded.
by hgs3 2y ago
Unfortunately, the entire reason I didn't release Unicorn under an OSI approved license is because I see many (most?) FOSS projects are chronically underfunded. Now, I did not quit my job and build this to get rich or anything, but I do need to earn enough to sustain myself. If there's enough interest, I would consider crowdfunding a release under an OSI license.
- kouteiheika 2y agoWhy not dual license it under a commercial license and something like GPL?
- hgs3 2y agoI went back and forth on this and in my uncertainty I decided it was better to start more "closed" first with the potential to become more "open" over time.
- h4ck_th3_pl4n3t 2y agoTherefore it will never be open source, and if so then only when you lost interest in the project. Got it.