4 ms·

Nice!

• sushidev 2y ago
  But not interesting for me in any way since it’s not open source.
  • hgs3 2y ago
    Unfortunately, the entire reason I didn't release Unicorn under an OSI approved license is because I see many (most?) FOSS projects are chronically underfunded. Now, I did not quit my job and build this to get rich or anything, but I do need to earn enough to sustain myself. If there's enough interest, I would consider crowdfunding a release under an OSI license.
    • kouteiheika 2y ago
      Why not dual license it under a commercial license and something like GPL?
      • hgs3 2y ago
        I went back and forth on this and in my uncertainty I decided it was better to start more "closed" first with the potential to become more "open" over time.
        • h4ck_th3_pl4n3t 2y ago
          Therefore it will never be open source, and if so then only when you lost interest in the project. Got it.
• deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
• hgs3 2y ago
  Thank you, let me know if you have any questions.
  • sushidev 2y ago
    Who is your main target audience?
    • hgs3 2y ago
      Primarily, companies developing for embedded systems or other resource constrained devices.