3 ms·
Which is why I specifically stated that the feature set matches and not that they're drop in replacements. Then gave a giant disclaimer about open source softwa
by deaddodo 2y ago
Which is why I specifically stated that the feature set matches and not that they're drop in replacements. Then gave a giant disclaimer about open source software in general at the bottom.
I'm not evangelizing, I'm stating that the listed software/workloads are perfectly amenable to Linux if you wanted to make the move/relearn those softwares.
- tsimionescu 2y agoAlmost none of the software you mentioned is a realistic, fully featured, profesionally-usbale alternative to the software that doesn't run on Linux. So, overall, Linux can't be an alternative to the Mac and/or Windows for anyone who relies on these tools.