3 ms·
LLMs are decent at Pandas. I say "decent" because most of the available training data for Pandas does things in a naive way. OTOH, they are horrible at Polars
by __mharrison__ 2y ago
LLMs are decent at Pandas.
I say "decent" because most of the available training data for Pandas does things in a naive way.
OTOH, they are horrible at Polars. (I figure this is mostly a lack of training data.)
- disgruntledphd2 2y ago> I say "decent" because most of the available training data for Pandas does things in a naive way. They're around the level of the median user, which is pretty bad as pandas is a big and complicated API with many different approaches available (as is base R, in case people think I'm just hating on pandas).