5 ms·
For-profit isn't the problem. Lying about being non-profit to raise funds, and _then_ become for-profit, that's the underlying concern.
by factorialboy 2y ago
For-profit isn't the problem. Lying about being non-profit to raise funds, and _then_ become for-profit, that's the underlying concern.
- ozim 2y agoThat should be top comment on all OpenAI threads. Just like “open source and forever free” - until of course it starts to make sense charging money.
- retinaros 2y agoyes but its easy to hate musk thinking u siding with the good guys...
- boringg 2y agotheres no good guys at the executive level of the AI world - its money and power dressed in saving humanity language.
- catigula 2y agoYes, which means his post is an attempt to smear the credibility of musk, not make a legal defense. If this were a legal defense, this would be heard in court.
- toasteros 2y ago[flagged]
- lesuorac 2y agoToo bad not disclosing that you always intended to convert the non-profit into a for-profit during your testimony while numerous senators congratulate you about your non-profit values isn't problematic. https://www.techpolicy.press/transcript-senate-judiciary-subcommittee-hearing-on-oversight-of-ai/ https://www.techpolicy.press/transcript-senate-judiciary-sub...
- throwoutway 2y agoCan this be considered perjury?
- compootr 2y agocorporate puffery?
- boringg 2y agoIts true. Also it looks like Musks original statement was correct that they should have gone with a C-corp instead of a NFP.
- crowcroft 2y agoSome might characterize OpenAI leadership as not 'consistently candid'.
- m463 2y agoAlso, the missing message here is "we want to become for-profit"
- ksec 2y ago>For-profit isn't the problem It was a problem around 2014 - 2022. Even the lying part isn't new. It has always been there. But somehow most were blind to it during the same period. Something changed and I dont know what it is. But the pendulum is definitely swinging back.