7 ms·
It’s already implied by the presence of secure_random and it isn’t insecure when it’s being used for the appropriate use case.
by benatkin 2y ago
It’s already implied by the presence of secure_random and it isn’t insecure when it’s being used for the appropriate use case.
- IshKebab 2y agoIt's only implied by secure_random if you know secure_random exists. This is a very very very well known thing. The default MUST be secure.