> The thing off by a factor of 10 here was not the level of the chemical, it was the calculation of the recommended safety level. Doesn't matter to the point I

> The thing off by a factor of 10 here was not the level of the chemical, it was the calculation of the recommended safety level. Doesn't matter to the point I was making which is that a factor of ten is significant enough that you can't just assume what happens at X level means the same for 1/10th of it or 10x it.