I admit I gave up halfway through the article out of sheer embarrassment for the author, so maybe it gets better, but is this really fitting for hn? It reads l

I admit I gave up halfway through the article out of sheer embarrassment for the author, so maybe it gets better, but is this really fitting for hn? It reads like cheap culture-war drivel, without even the usual pseudo-intellectual affections, instead concentrating on plain reactionary foolishness. Of course we are supposed to steelman different viewpoints here, but I'm at a loss with this.