5 ms·
American cops are using AI to draft police reports, and the ACLU isn't happy
- kylecazar 2y agoA YC company, Abel Police, is doing exactly this.
- quantified 2y agoEagerly awaiting the news that no one will be liable for someone's wrongful incarceration based on LLM hallucination. The business model for LLMs will be that no one is liable. They were for a while, like when the airline chatbot quoted a lowball fare and was forced to accept it. But that will be rolled back as the stakes get higher.
- boredatoms 2y agoMay as well just have the AI write the court judgements too
- fakedang 2y agoMight as well replace the jury with AI personas
- singleshot_ 2y agoFascinating. Are they still hearsay, then, given that there is no declarant?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- serjester 2y agoTo anyone that thinks this is a bad idea honestly try doing a ride along (where you get to spend the day following a police officer). The amount of paperwork they do is insane - a single crash report can be 4+ pages long and the vast majority of the questions are incredibly menial.
- GrantMoyer 2y agoOkay, so get rid of the menial questions. If you can't get rid of them because they're important, then definitely don't use an ML model to make up answers for them.
- bean-weevil 2y agoThis is the most important point in the entire thread.
- kirkules 2y agoAgree, looking for the multi upvote button
- heavyset_go 2y agoI have a hard time caring. People's lives and freedoms are at stake. If they can't take the time to do their jobs, perhaps they should find another career.
- blackeyeblitzar 2y agoI don’t think that’s fair. It’s not about them disliking the work. It’s about me as a taxpayer wanting police officers to have time for policing. I want the most safety benefit for the money we spend. So I’m supportive of them using tools to be more efficient.
- EA-3167 2y agoThat paperwork, being careful that due process is followed and documented, is part of policing.
- edmundsauto 2y agoThen we’re going to need to spend waaaaay more money on policing, if we don’t allow any paperwork shortcuts. Imagine 2 hours per report for a 2 hour incident - we’d need to double the staffing versus a no paperwork force. Or just stop responding to nonviolent crime, which already happens. We’ve got to be realistic about the tradeoffs.
- nine_zeros 2y agoWho owns the liability if someone is falsely charged?
- hyperhello 2y agoThat's a complicated question. Let's just say we have ways of deciding who's guilty.
- Spivak 2y agoWait until you find out that CPS is using AI to do the same thing to much applause and bonuses. Turns out people regardless of career field don't like doing tedious work. Can't say I'm surprised that software isn't included in the moral panic about AI usage on HN. Despite as a group using it secure people's private data, handle people's money, process insurance claims, etc.. When we use it we understand that we're still experts evaluating and editing the output but when other people do it they're lazy, careless, and actively malicious. Do you really have a problem with AI or do you just not trust the cops regardless of what tools they use?
- Terr_ 2y ago> When we use it [...] Do you really have a problem with AI "What do you mean by 'we', Kemo Sabe?" -- I don't use LLMs, and I do indeed have a problem with them. Just because conflicting opinions can be found within a large group (i.e. HN commentators) does not mean every member of the group is a self-contradicting weirdo. (Fallacy of composition.)
- salawat 2y agoSoftware can be proven. You can exhaustively test a program for a particular hardware configuration, and logically speaking you can get proofs of validity. There aren't those proofs now because the "Free Market" decided there was more value to be had using shitty software now rather than proving it out first through testing. Hence why every license provides no guarantee of fitness for purpose and disclaims warrantee to the extent practicable by law. But given time, those claims can and waivers and warnings aren't necessary. The discrete math will just work out that way. Now ask the AI producers/users to accept personal liability based on a stochastic probability machine. I imagine you won't see many hands raising to take you up on the offer.
- Terr_ 2y agoYeah: There's a huge difference between "confidence in the product itself" versus "confidence that if the product breaks someone other than me will be paying for the damages."
- 2y ago
- vlark 2y agoThe simple solution is for DAs to refuse to prosecute any crimes where the police reports were written with AI and judges to refuse to allow any evidence written or compiled by or with the assistance of AI.
- demarq 2y agohow simple is it to detect AI?
- more_corn 2y agoIt is impossible to definitively identify AI or eliminate generative ai use in any given piece of writing. There are detectors out there but they all have high levels of false positives. And unknown levels of false negatives. Why? There are at least 5 common generative ai services (which display different behaviors depending on how they’re prompted and what has previously been in the context), there are hundreds of thousands of open models, millions of different ways you could set up retrieval augmented generation, infinite ways you can prompt. That said It is quite easy (for professors for example) to pick up on common linguistic and structural patterns. (Chat gpt uses certain words more commonly, structures arguments in a particular way, uses and misuses the same metaphorical structures)
- krapp 2y agoThe "simple solution" would be to make the use of AI illegal in the criminal justice system. Judges and prosecutors can't (or at least shouldn't be allowed to) simply refuse to prosecute crimes which have otherwise been legally processed and presented.
- cbanek 2y agoInstead of using AI to summarize body cameras, why not just release the body camera footage along with the police report? This is almost never done, usually you have to wait for discovery and the trial process to get access to the body cam footage, while the cops can and do lie/exaggerate all the time on the reports. Then you have to pay for a lawyer just to get to the data of truth, which easily costs citizens thousands of dollars. Though they don't call it lying, they call it the "officer's recollection." That's how you get things like, everyone smells like weed and/or alcohol, everyone is resisting arrest, everyone is "defiant and uncooperative." Plus, many times they will charge you extra money for the body cam footage. Trust me, all they really need to do is prevent the body cams from being turned off and/or muted, and present the body cam footage to all parties at the start, and we'd have a revolution in policing. Especially if all these police reports are drafted from incomplete body cam footage where the officer knowingly covers their camera, turns it off, or mutes it for no good reason. A lot of cops have gotten caught planting evidence from their own body cam. Same for dashcams. They should be released immediately. There is no reason not to other than to try to muscle normal citizens out of their constitutional rights.
- namaria 2y agoYeah I mean if the police is going to use some software tool to do the reporting, then just release the raw footage and let the courts decide what happened. As it is police officers have way too much latitude to determine what gets written down.
- more_corn 2y agoThis is a great boon for defense attorneys. “Your honor the police department uses ai to generate police reports. Exhibit 1) shows numerous studies showing that hallucinations are common in generative AI. I therefore request that the police report be removed from evidence in the case against my client.”