4 ms·

There is more evidence here than just pictures from this one article. The pentagon, for example, just declared that they do not know what they are[1]. Among ma

There is more evidence here than just pictures from this one article. The pentagon, for example, just declared that they do not know what they are[1]. Among many other credible sources. [1]https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1hc1l58/pentagon_no_evidence_its_any_foreign_entity_its/ https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1hc1l58/pentagon_no_e...

antonvs 2y ago
> There is more evidence here than just pictures from this one article. What “more evidence”? All the Pentagon is saying is that there’s no evidence that’s a foreign entity is behind it. Not “more” evidence.
- sitkack 2y ago
  Can you or can you not draw a red line with a blue pen?
  - sitkack 2y ago
    The Expert (Short Comedy Sketch) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg It was a comment on the inability of half of this thread to use basic logic.
Amezarak 2y ago
> The pentagon, for example, just declared that they do not know what they are[1]. This sounds impressive, but people don't seem to realize that there is no USGOV tracking of drone-sized objects in US airspace. Of course they can't say who is doing it or where they're coming from, they also don't know what's going on when you launch a drone from your backyard and fly it around. The FAA has a database of reports of people illegally flying drones around planes and airports, it's been happening constantly since they've been mass market items and the perps rarely get caught.
- bragr 2y ago
  >people don't seem to realize that there is no USGOV tracking of drone-sized objects Anything 250g or heavier has to have Remote ID now. Now that doesn't exclude the possibility of illegal drones without it, but it isn't true that there is "no drone tracking". https://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/remote_id https://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/remote_id https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-F/part-89 https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-F...
  - op00to 2y ago
    What do you think Drone ID is? It’s basically Bluetooth transmissions. Very localized reception and basically impossible to monitor over a wide area without many, many receivers spread out evenly all over the place.
    - deleted 2y ago
      [deleted]
  - 15155 2y ago
    Who exactly is enforcing this law in reality?
  - echoangle 2y ago
    Unless there are also receivers for this operated by the government, that's technically not a conflict with the claim. Tracking means you're tracking something, not just forcing them to send a signal. It's only tracking once you receive and process the signal.
pavel_lishin 2y ago
> The pentagon, for example, just declared that they do not know what they are That is absolutely not what was said in that video. They just said that they're not drones from a foreign entity or adversary, nor are they US military drones.
- chrisco255 2y ago
  Could they be defense contractor drones being tested?
block_dagger 2y ago
The Pentagon - credible!? Ha.
mrandish 2y ago
> The pentagon, for example, just declared that they do not know what they are I often hear those hyping UFO sightings citing this type of statement by the Pentagon. However, the Pentagon saying the don't know what it is doesn't mean anything. Of course, they don't know what it is. They weren't there. They didn't see it nor have any idea if there was anything unusual seen. The null hypothesis is the still the most likely: this is a result of media hype causing increased erroneous reports of aircraft and hobbyist drones along with false reports by social media attention seekers. Also, the Pentagon has a consistently terrible track record of failing to properly identify spurious internal lens reflections, digital stabilization artifacts, IR ghosting and gimbal rotation on their own footage. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsEjV8DdSbs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsEjV8DdSbs.
mrguyorama 2y ago
The pentagon also didn't tell anyone in the 80s that all the "UFO sightings" in Nevada were test flights of the F-117. You know the pentagon doesn't have to tell you (or even the feds!) the truth, right? You know that when they say "We can't track 1 trillion dollars of our budget!" they aren't being fully honest, right?

antonvs 2y ago

> There is more evidence here than just pictures from this one article. What “more evidence”? All the Pentagon is saying is that there’s no evidence that’s a foreign entity is behind it. Not “more” evidence.

sitkack 2y ago
Can you or can you not draw a red line with a blue pen?
- sitkack 2y ago
  The Expert (Short Comedy Sketch) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg It was a comment on the inability of half of this thread to use basic logic.

Amezarak 2y ago

> The pentagon, for example, just declared that they do not know what they are[1]. This sounds impressive, but people don't seem to realize that there is no USGOV tracking of drone-sized objects in US airspace. Of course they can't say who is doing it or where they're coming from, they also don't know what's going on when you launch a drone from your backyard and fly it around. The FAA has a database of reports of people illegally flying drones around planes and airports, it's been happening constantly since they've been mass market items and the perps rarely get caught.

bragr 2y ago
>people don't seem to realize that there is no USGOV tracking of drone-sized objects Anything 250g or heavier has to have Remote ID now. Now that doesn't exclude the possibility of illegal drones without it, but it isn't true that there is "no drone tracking". https://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/remote_id https://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/remote_id https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-F/part-89 https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-F...
- op00to 2y ago
  What do you think Drone ID is? It’s basically Bluetooth transmissions. Very localized reception and basically impossible to monitor over a wide area without many, many receivers spread out evenly all over the place.
  - deleted 2y ago
    [deleted]
- 15155 2y ago
  Who exactly is enforcing this law in reality?
- echoangle 2y ago
  Unless there are also receivers for this operated by the government, that's technically not a conflict with the claim. Tracking means you're tracking something, not just forcing them to send a signal. It's only tracking once you receive and process the signal.

pavel_lishin 2y ago

> The pentagon, for example, just declared that they do not know what they are That is absolutely not what was said in that video. They just said that they're not drones from a foreign entity or adversary, nor are they US military drones.

chrisco255 2y ago
Could they be defense contractor drones being tested?

block_dagger 2y ago

The Pentagon - credible!? Ha.

mrandish 2y ago

> The pentagon, for example, just declared that they do not know what they are I often hear those hyping UFO sightings citing this type of statement by the Pentagon. However, the Pentagon saying the don't know what it is doesn't mean anything. Of course, they don't know what it is. They weren't there. They didn't see it nor have any idea if there was anything unusual seen. The null hypothesis is the still the most likely: this is a result of media hype causing increased erroneous reports of aircraft and hobbyist drones along with false reports by social media attention seekers. Also, the Pentagon has a consistently terrible track record of failing to properly identify spurious internal lens reflections, digital stabilization artifacts, IR ghosting and gimbal rotation on their own footage. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsEjV8DdSbs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsEjV8DdSbs.

mrguyorama 2y ago

The pentagon also didn't tell anyone in the 80s that all the "UFO sightings" in Nevada were test flights of the F-117. You know the pentagon doesn't have to tell you (or even the feds!) the truth, right? You know that when they say "We can't track 1 trillion dollars of our budget!" they aren't being fully honest, right?