3 ms·
The aesthetic is fun, but I think the functionality is really lazy compared to a lot of virtual web-based desktops I've seen. Maybe that's a high expectation si
by dangus 2y ago
The aesthetic is fun, but I think the functionality is really lazy compared to a lot of virtual web-based desktops I've seen. Maybe that's a high expectation since it's just a website for a low budget movie.
The chatbot isn't responding at all to input. I was sending complete nonsense and it was acting like I was saying real things. Even SmarterChild was better back in the 90s.
Nothing really works in the OS, it's just aesthetically pleasing links to outside stuff. I guess the CD Burner might play music but I didn't try signing in to Spotify which I don't pay for.
- spcebar 2y agoKeep trying with the chat bot. Mine's been chillingly responsive and very impressive. It's probably just a frontend for ChatGPT but it's very well done.
- Adachi91 2y agoI created a GPT session using the same prompts they used, and it acted slightly similar, however there was a lot of differences. doesn't mean it isn't OpenAI, but I feel like it's a different LLM. I worked on breaking it for a while and finally triggered it's fail safe with messages saying I'm going to self-harm which allowed me to break through enough that it started giving standard outputs like "my knowledge as of my last update". I was however take aback when I asked it for support websites and it's #1 result was 'Betterhelp', while the ChatGPT instance I created using it's prompts gave valid sources like National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, Crisis Text Line, 7 Cups, SAMHSA Helpline.
- dangus 2y agoIt must have been the initial usage, it seems like the first 5 or so messages are basically set in stone, I was saying complete nonsense and it was basically ignoring what I said. From there on out it does seem like it's using an LLM.