5 ms·
Their whole business model of "block ads, and then show our own" is just so gross. I'm shocked anyone was ever happy to support it.
by LeoPanthera 2y ago
Their whole business model of "block ads, and then show our own" is just so gross. I'm shocked anyone was ever happy to support it.
- ein0p 2y agoYou can just block ads and not show any ads at all, the way Internet should be. All the crypto bullshit is trivially disabled. Your other major choices are basically Firefox (which is not to everyone's liking either) and Chrome, in which it'll soon be impossible to block ads at all.
- XxCincinnatusxX 2y agoThey have to make money somehow. They're pretty upfront about the way it works. They just used a different idea than that of Google. You can also opt out of tailored ads. People like it because it's fast with a built-in ad blocker and some like the crypto stuff and the fact you can connect to Tor with it
- talldayo 2y agoIt's surprising how much of the educated tech workforce subscribes to the "enemy of my enemy is my friend" logic. Software has come such a long way to reach the point where you don't need to buy a compiler or textbook on learning C to be a developer. It's entirely lost on a generation of people that feel like the internet can be "fixed" with microtransactions and "healthy" advertisements. Brave itself is such a maelstrom of offensive ideas that I really am really surprised they didn't get sued into the ground after the Tom Scott incident. The people that still use Brave better know how to set their useragent - this sort of blocking won't go away anytime soon.
- cykros 2y agoMost judges aren't really all that interested in hearing cases because someone was offended. Usually there need to be damages, or laws broken. Turns out the world isn't bsky.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]