3 ms·
> then you could argue that MM:HH has a valid use case. (It does not.) "twenty past ten" (It does.)
by SideburnsOfDoom 2y ago
> then you could argue that MM:HH has a valid use case. (It does not.)
"twenty past ten"
(It does.)
- Dylan16807 2y ago"twenty till ten" is just as valid, so I don't see either of those as a true example of MM:HH.