3 ms·

The beauty is, no matter how bad it gets, the GOP has figured out how to pin ALL the blame on the Dems, liberals, Muslims, homosexuals, Mexicans, Hillary's pizz

• rayiner 2y ago
  Ironically, Hispanics have higher life expectancies than white people, so the GOP can’t blame the decline on them. But Hispanics also have the lowest access to healthcare coverage, so democrats can’t blame declining life expectancy on not spending enough money on healthcare or whatever either. The real reason seems to be that Americans are disproportionately fat, lonely, and live apart from extended family.
  • tptacek 2y ago
    Or you could just go look this up. Ranking of life expectancy asks the question of what causes contribute the most to the life expectancy shortfall between the US and the countries ahead of us on the rankings. The mix of contributions is different depending on which country (Australia looks more like us than France), but across the board the most consistent major factors are homicide, firearms, motor vehicle accidents, and drug overdoses. No matter what country you look at, those are the ones that are always distinctively different here.
    • hilux 2y ago
      Do you think that the factors you mentioned, most obviously drug overdoses, might be linked to being lonely and disconnected from family?
      • kasey_junk 2y ago
        Why would the US have more loneliness and disconnection than family than the comparison cohort?
        • hollerith 2y ago
          Because since its founding, the main organizing principle of the US has been individual freedom and individual autonomy. It has taken that principle further than any other country since medieval Iceland.
          • tptacek 2y ago
            And if I don't believe that the US has pushed autonomy at the expense of family connection past whatever it was "medieval Iceland" did...?
            • hollerith 2y ago
              It would be hard to persuade you in a comment, but I guess it doesn't hurt to try. Cocaine and opium remained large social problems in the US for decades before they were finally outlawed. The consensus during those decades was that a federal law against them would be an unacceptable compromise of the liberty of the individual. (Various states had banned cocaine and opium in a timely manner, but these statewide bans did not do much to discourage use because of how easy it is for a resident of one state to get drugs from another state.) Then when they did pass a federal law against the drugs, to appease the pro-liberty faction, the law was not an outright ban, but rather a "stamp tax" where the details were such that it would be unprofitable to sell drugs and pay the tax (and the penalty for not paying included significant jail time). The same thing happened with federal income tax: its enactment was delayed for decades out of a belief that it would be a violation of the liberty-promoting measures in the Constitution.