3 ms·
lets pack this altogether. so you don't believe it would save lives? prevention is better than a cure and with AGI this would significantly a lot of people, n
by colesantiago 2y ago
lets pack this altogether.
so you don't believe it would save lives?
prevention is better than a cure and with AGI this would significantly a lot of people, not just SF.
> smart people have already been working on,
If they were so smart why haven't they found it yet? We now have weather prediction and protein folding now solved problems which were extremely difficult problems.
I don't see how this doesn't apply to earthquake prediction, if it has to take AGI to solve it then so be it.
- dekhn 2y agoI think it's unlikely having better earthquake prediction would save lives in an economically justifiable way. Neither weather prediction or protein folding are solved problems; that's the press misrepresenting the advances here.
- colesantiago 2y agoI wouldn't have expected Google DeepMind, Science or Nature to be part of the press and of course they are misrepresenting advances in protein folding and super accurate weather prediction with little to no case studies or breakthroughs in this area which are better than what humans can do. https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/gencast-predicts-weather-and-the-risks-of-extreme-conditions-with-sota-accuracy/ https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/gencast-predicts-weath... https://deepmind.google/technologies/alphafold/ https://deepmind.google/technologies/alphafold/ https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/gencast-predicts-weather-and-the-risks-of-extreme-conditions-with-sota-accuracy/ https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/gencast-predicts-weath... https://www.science.org/stoken/author-tokens/ST-1550/full https://www.science.org/stoken/author-tokens/ST-1550/full https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08252-9 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08252-9 But whatever you say.