> they have to accept being told 'no' They can always hire another engineer. They only accept it, some times, because they won't find a certified engineer that

> they have to accept being told 'no' They can always hire another engineer. They only accept it, some times, because they won't find a certified engineer that says "yes", and because they doing it themselves is a crime. That equates to a huge amount of government intervention on the lives of everybody. And even then, fails way more often than expected. Now, we are talking about a case where criminal justice failed to uphold the defendants rights to a fair trial. Most probably because of corruption. Do we really want to bring that huge amount of government intervention into this context?