5 ms·

Just thought you might want to know - it's "per se" not "per say"/variations thereof.

by iterance 2y ago

asveikau 2y ago
Per se is latin for "for itself".
- casta 2y ago
  I'd say "by itself".
  - asveikau 2y ago
    That's another valid translation for the same preposition. And there are many definitions of English "for" as well. This would fit the one used in the phrase "if not for this, ..." In other words, for itself = by virtue of itself, through the existence of itself. Also note in terms of Indo European roots, per is a cognate with English for.
    - dhosek 2y ago
      Prepositions are some of the least translatable bits of language. For that matter, even without translation they tend to get slippery within a language, especially over time (one that springs to mind is the whole “quarter of” referring to a time which I first encountered some 50 years ago and still don’t know if it’s quarter to or quarter after).¹ ⸻ 1. Cue some dude to tell me in 3…2…1² 2. And this knowledge will promptly disappear from my brain five minutes later, sort of like the guy I knew in my 20s whose name was either Jack or Chad and to this date, I still am not sure, but I do know that every single time I called him by name, I got it wrong and it totally wasn’t on purpose even though he didn’t believe me.
      - zelphirkalt 2y ago
        That's my cue! I once had a Spanish teacher, who also had problems remembering what that kind of time specification stands for and I came up with maybe a trick to remember. We do the same thing in German, so I guess it translates: Lets say you have 11:00. That's easy. But what about 11:15? We would say "quarter 12", so I guess the English version is "quarter of 12". How to memorize, that this is 11:15? Well, you can imagine a round clock and the minute pointer has moved _quarter of its way to 12_. So you only have a quarter of that hour "already done". 10:30? We say "half 11". So I guess English is "half of 11", meaning that the minute pointer has moved half the way to 11. Maybe this will help. (Actually I personally usually don't use those ways of specifying the time, neither in English nor in German. I just say the 24h format as it is written: "11:15" is "eleven fifteen", 13:35 is "thirteen thirtee five" not 1pm something.)
        card_zero 2y ago
        Whatever "quarter of 12" means in English, whether it's 11:45 (quarter to 12) or 12:15 (quarter past 12), it definitely isn't 11:15. We do fraction of an hour forward or backward relative to the hour mentioned, not fraction of an hour elapsed in approach to hour mentioned. I recently encountered a German asking for the English phrase equivalent to bis unter, looking for a phrase like "up to below". There isn't one in common use. We just don't count things in equivalent ways.
        monkpit 2y ago
        Isn’t _bis unter_ akin to “just under”, or “right up to”? I feel like either of those could work depending on the context and are common in English.
        fhars 2y ago
        It is "up to but not including".
        Melatonic 2y ago
        This is not great advice - the only way I have heard it in English would be "quarter past 11" to mean 11:15. Most people would just say "eleven fifteen".
      - dghf 2y ago
        Tok Pisin, a.k.a. New Guinea Pidgin, has exactly two prepositions: bilong, which means "of" or "from" in a possessive or attributive sense; and long, which means everything else.
        dhosek 2y ago
        I have to admit that I was a bit surprised when my ex-wife listed off Spanish prepositions to discover that it excludes a lot of words I would have thought were prepositions but Spanish considers adverbs and only become prepositional when used in conjunction with one of the enumerated prepositions, usually (always?) de.
      - TeMPOraL 2y ago
        > quarter of Still can't beat stuff like "bi-weekly" which can mean "every two weeks" or "twice a week" or probably some other thing as well.
        brigandish 2y ago
        Fortunately, fortnightly exists :)
        lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2y ago
        As is often the case, Randall Munroe has already delivered: https://xkcd.com/1602/ https://xkcd.com/1602/. Perhaps the joke in this context would be if it said "bi-weekly". "You should come to our Linguistics Club's bi-weekly meeting. Membership is open to anyone who can figure out how often we meet." (I mean, you have a 50-50 shot. I wonder if there's any personality insights one could learn from such a selection.)
        chrisweekly 2y ago
        yeah. for years, there's "biennial" (every 2 years) vs "biannual" (twice in 1 year). no such luck w/ months or weeks. also your username is almost as salient to the topic as mine! ;)
  - kspacewalk2 2y ago
    If you translate it literally, "per" is closer to "for". If you don't translate it literally, I'd vote for "in itself". "In itself" (viewed in its essential qualities; considered separately from other things[0]) has a different meaning than "by itself" (alone/unaided). And to me it's clear that "per se" pretty much universally means the former. [0] https://www.google.com/search?q=in+itself https://www.google.com/search?q=in+itself
    - grepLeigh 2y ago
      A less literal translation like "essentially" or "in essence" is deployed by master Latin translators like Robert Fagles. I've even seen "in a vacuum" which does a better job at communicating the original intent than a string of cryptic prepositions.
      - OrangeMusic 2y ago
        Sometimes I use it (maybe wrongly?) as a synonym to "technically". "Maybe John is not the boss per se, but we follow his orders" "Maybe John is not technically the boss, but we follow his orders"
- gweinberg 2y ago
  Maybe word for word, but "per se" means "as such".

Just thought you might want to know - it's "per se" not "per say"/variations thereof.

asveikau 2y ago

Per se is latin for "for itself".

casta 2y ago
I'd say "by itself".
- asveikau 2y ago
  That's another valid translation for the same preposition. And there are many definitions of English "for" as well. This would fit the one used in the phrase "if not for this, ..." In other words, for itself = by virtue of itself, through the existence of itself. Also note in terms of Indo European roots, per is a cognate with English for.
  - dhosek 2y ago
    Prepositions are some of the least translatable bits of language. For that matter, even without translation they tend to get slippery within a language, especially over time (one that springs to mind is the whole “quarter of” referring to a time which I first encountered some 50 years ago and still don’t know if it’s quarter to or quarter after).¹ ⸻ 1. Cue some dude to tell me in 3…2…1² 2. And this knowledge will promptly disappear from my brain five minutes later, sort of like the guy I knew in my 20s whose name was either Jack or Chad and to this date, I still am not sure, but I do know that every single time I called him by name, I got it wrong and it totally wasn’t on purpose even though he didn’t believe me.
    - zelphirkalt 2y ago
      That's my cue! I once had a Spanish teacher, who also had problems remembering what that kind of time specification stands for and I came up with maybe a trick to remember. We do the same thing in German, so I guess it translates: Lets say you have 11:00. That's easy. But what about 11:15? We would say "quarter 12", so I guess the English version is "quarter of 12". How to memorize, that this is 11:15? Well, you can imagine a round clock and the minute pointer has moved _quarter of its way to 12_. So you only have a quarter of that hour "already done". 10:30? We say "half 11". So I guess English is "half of 11", meaning that the minute pointer has moved half the way to 11. Maybe this will help. (Actually I personally usually don't use those ways of specifying the time, neither in English nor in German. I just say the 24h format as it is written: "11:15" is "eleven fifteen", 13:35 is "thirteen thirtee five" not 1pm something.)
      - card_zero 2y ago
        Whatever "quarter of 12" means in English, whether it's 11:45 (quarter to 12) or 12:15 (quarter past 12), it definitely isn't 11:15. We do fraction of an hour forward or backward relative to the hour mentioned, not fraction of an hour elapsed in approach to hour mentioned. I recently encountered a German asking for the English phrase equivalent to bis unter, looking for a phrase like "up to below". There isn't one in common use. We just don't count things in equivalent ways.
        monkpit 2y ago
        Isn’t _bis unter_ akin to “just under”, or “right up to”? I feel like either of those could work depending on the context and are common in English.
        fhars 2y ago
        It is "up to but not including".
      - Melatonic 2y ago
        This is not great advice - the only way I have heard it in English would be "quarter past 11" to mean 11:15. Most people would just say "eleven fifteen".
    - dghf 2y ago
      Tok Pisin, a.k.a. New Guinea Pidgin, has exactly two prepositions: bilong, which means "of" or "from" in a possessive or attributive sense; and long, which means everything else.
      - dhosek 2y ago
        I have to admit that I was a bit surprised when my ex-wife listed off Spanish prepositions to discover that it excludes a lot of words I would have thought were prepositions but Spanish considers adverbs and only become prepositional when used in conjunction with one of the enumerated prepositions, usually (always?) de.
    - TeMPOraL 2y ago
      > quarter of Still can't beat stuff like "bi-weekly" which can mean "every two weeks" or "twice a week" or probably some other thing as well.
      - brigandish 2y ago
        Fortunately, fortnightly exists :)
      - lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2y ago
        As is often the case, Randall Munroe has already delivered: https://xkcd.com/1602/ https://xkcd.com/1602/. Perhaps the joke in this context would be if it said "bi-weekly". "You should come to our Linguistics Club's bi-weekly meeting. Membership is open to anyone who can figure out how often we meet." (I mean, you have a 50-50 shot. I wonder if there's any personality insights one could learn from such a selection.)
      - chrisweekly 2y ago
        yeah. for years, there's "biennial" (every 2 years) vs "biannual" (twice in 1 year). no such luck w/ months or weeks. also your username is almost as salient to the topic as mine! ;)
- kspacewalk2 2y ago
  If you translate it literally, "per" is closer to "for". If you don't translate it literally, I'd vote for "in itself". "In itself" (viewed in its essential qualities; considered separately from other things[0]) has a different meaning than "by itself" (alone/unaided). And to me it's clear that "per se" pretty much universally means the former. [0] https://www.google.com/search?q=in+itself https://www.google.com/search?q=in+itself
  - grepLeigh 2y ago
    A less literal translation like "essentially" or "in essence" is deployed by master Latin translators like Robert Fagles. I've even seen "in a vacuum" which does a better job at communicating the original intent than a string of cryptic prepositions.
    - OrangeMusic 2y ago
      Sometimes I use it (maybe wrongly?) as a synonym to "technically". "Maybe John is not the boss per se, but we follow his orders" "Maybe John is not technically the boss, but we follow his orders"
gweinberg 2y ago
Maybe word for word, but "per se" means "as such".